The hardware alone cost them several million $, though them splurging on it is also one of the main reasons tech wise they were able to do so much more impressive work then most devs during the PS1 era. These not only required a lot more time to make then a typical real-time environment (at the time when realtime environments were extremely simple), but required extremely expensive hardware ($100k+ SGI workstations). I don't dislike RE, but I have a greater appreciation for Silent Hill.īut why? im not saying i have any clue but what do you think made ff7 so expensive and not PDSĪre prerendered graphics more expensive than real time 3d?įF7 used pre-rendered backgrounds, hundreds (thousands?) of them. I played both games with some friends with the lights off and the stereo up. Silent Hill (original) is way better than Resident Evil, in my opinion. I first played it back when the Saturn was still a current system. You don't wanna be like the kids today that rant against Ocarina of Time. It was also one of my first Nintendo 64 games.
I felt Turok: Dinosaur Hunter was the only one to use fog just right. I just knew the graphics would be f***ing up left and right without that excessive fog. I just got annoyed with the overuse of it and how it was beyond dense and made every creature to pop out just cheap as hell. I didn't have the "The fog is great and atmospheric!" mindset. I also heard a ton of people claiming Silent Hill is better than Resident Evil and I eventually decided to download and play that. It was also well after it had gained the massive status it has.
0 kommentar(er)
